Consuming process parameters from code usually takes a code block like the following, taken from OrderBatchProcess:
Using this pattern is time consuming, bulky and prone to errors during development time (e.g.: typos).
The class SvrProcess2 attempts to takes care of some of these issues, but it enforces coding conventions and uses reflection on all class attributes/fields. This class has 0 usages at the core.
This ticket is created in order to explore alternatives to ease the declaration and consumption of process parameters.
Environment
N/A
Activity
Show:
Hiep Lq March 31, 2025 at 3:45 AM
SvrProcess.getFieldsWithParameters use clazz.getDeclaredFields() to query field so inherit field isn’t count do you think improve to query inherit field is worthy?
Saulo Gil March 14, 2022 at 2:20 AM
Feature documented at
Saulo Gil November 3, 2021 at 1:24 PM
Edited
Created pull request #963 where the proposal is to flag class fields as parameters by using a new @Parameter annotation. With this, the head of the class mentioned in the ticket definition would look like:
Minor
Consuming process parameters from code usually takes a code block like the following, taken from OrderBatchProcess:
Using this pattern is time consuming, bulky and prone to errors during development time (e.g.: typos).
The class
SvrProcess2attempts to takes care of some of these issues, but it enforces coding conventions and uses reflection on all class attributes/fields. This class has 0 usages at the core.This ticket is created in order to explore alternatives to ease the declaration and consumption of process parameters.