Is Necessary the void for the Post Depreciation Entry
Unmark lines on A_Depreciation_Exp
and why don't reuse MFactAcct.deleteEx?
Hi i will work in a new Jira ticket to create the demo data for asset, but the void don’t affect the normal use of MDepreciationEntry
Done, Thank You (I was dropped the other method and put standard in the other classes)
1. I guess Carlos request test data for at least your case (void function). ever your code don't effect normal scenario it need to make sure will work on new scenario (void)
2. i look you not yet correct this one "initially I’m wondering that deleting fact_acct cannot be conducted on closed
periods, apparently there is no check about that."
he mean you only allow void on document on "open period"
i saw old code test for open period before delete each MDepreciationExp
but still need to check for main document MDepreciationEntry, i'm not sure
Hi , I closed the pull request and brought the two patches to the ticket - sorry I cannot test it unless reproducible instructions are provided.